Mortimer Adler: On
Anarchy
What most people have in mind when they use the
word "anarchist" is the image of a bomb-throwing
revolutionist. They do not know about the existence
of philosophical anarchists.
The philosophical anarchist is one who
mistakenly believes that human beings can live
together peacefully and harmoniously without
government. He denies the necessity and
indispensability of government for the existence of
society.
The following example will show why this is an
error. Let us suppose three scientists are going
off to explore the jungles of the Amazon river.
Before they depart, they must agree on some
principles that they unanimously accept as
governing their decisions while they remain
together. Either they must appoint one of them as
their leader and agree to abide by his or her
decisions, or they must agree on majority rule and
abide by the decisions of any two of them against
the third. Unless they unanimously accept one or
the other of these two principles governing their
making of decisions, they will not get very far
before they become disunited and at odds. The
mission that they are undertaking will fail.
Marxist thought includes the vision of a time
when the state and coercive government will wither
away and society will endure thereafter peacefully
without the existence of coercive government. The
dictatorship of the proletariat was thought to be
only the penultimate stage in the communist
revolution. The ultimate stage was envisioned as an
anarchist society -- one from which the evils of
government and coercive force had been totally
eliminated.
Anarchy exists in the world today only with
respect to sovereign states. A sovereign prince or
state is one that admits no governing superior. Two
or more sovereigns in their relation to one another
do not constitute a harmonious or peaceful society.
In fact, sovereigns are always in a state of war,
even when they are not engaged in actual warfare.
As Thomas Hobbes correctly observes, war consists
not only in actual battle, but in a tendency
thereto among sovereigns. We have came to call that
state of war, which does not involve actual
warfare, as a "cold war."
The League of Nations after the end of World War
I in this century, and the United Nations after
World War II were steps in the direction of peace,
but they did not go far enough. Only if a world
federal government were eventually established in
the future, a government that would possess a
monopoly of coercive force, would we have a state
of global peace from which the anarchy of sovereign
states and their state of war with one another
would be abolished.
Tyranny
& Despotism Index
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy Book...
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Magazine...
Academy
Showcase
Specials
|
|
|
|