Mortimer Adler: On
Democracy
The word "democracy" is misused both in academic
and popular speech to name any form of government
in which the many rather than the few have a voice
in government. As thus used it is distinguished
from oligarchy, and it is possible to say that
democracy began in ancient Athens under the regime
of Pericles. Philosophically speaking, the word
"democracy" applies to a form of government that
first appeared in the twentieth century.
In the United States, that appearance is as late
as 1964, when the Twenty-fourth Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution was adopted, abolishing the poll
tax and creating truly universal suffrage. But
still belonging to the future, is the economic
basis of democracy that other face of a truly
democratic society which secures the right to a
decent livelihood to which all citizens are
entitled. This is the proper meaning of
socialism.
Only when all mature and normal citizens are
economic haves as well as political haves, with
some haves having more and some having less
according to their contribution to the economy,
will we have a working approximation to the ideal
of a socialist democracy.
This news will shock the many who think that the
democratic ideal first made its appearance in
ancient Greece. In his funeral oration, Pericles
praises Athens for instituting democracy at a time
when, in an Athenian population of 120,000, only
30,000 were citizens and the rest were
disfranchised women, artisans, and slaves.
In our twentieth-century understanding of
political democracy, Athens was a constitutional
oligarchy, not a democracy. Individuals make the
same mistake when they think that in the eighteenth
and nineteenth centuries, the Constitution of the
United States was democratic rather than
oligarchic.
Lincoln insisted that a new nation "conceived in
liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all
men are created equal" came in to existence in 1776
with the Declaration of Independence, not with the
Constitution of 1789, which allowed slavery. But he
recognized that the Declaration expressed a hope
for a future that in fact began to be fulfilled
only in the twentieth century.
There are four main forms of government,
tyrannical despotism, benevolent despotism,
constitutional oligarchy, and constitutional
democracy. According to the principles of justice,
it can be argued that only the last of these is the
best form of government, because only it embodies
all the principles of political justice.
Tyrannical despotism is totally unjust, because
the de facto rulers govern with no one's consent,
with no one's participation, and for their own good
rather than for the good of the governed.
Benevolent despotism acknowledges that the good
of the governed should prevail. The welfare and
well-being of those subjected to benevolent despots
is the end that government should serve.
Nevertheless, that benevolence is curtailed by a
despotism that denies the right of human beings to
be governed with their consent, with a voice in
their own government, and with all their natural
rights secured.
Constitutional oligarchies, varying from place
to place and from time to time in the numbers of
persons who are enfranchised as citizens, are more
just than any despotism, tyrannical or benevolent,
because at least some human beings have political
liberty and the equality of citizenship. Such
governments remain unjust to the extent that the
rest of the population are governed as subjects or
as slaves.
When finally in the twentieth century truly
universal suffrage was established, we saw at last
a form of government that is demonstrably
democratic and completely just. If any injustice
remains for the future to abolish, it is the
economic justice of the socialist ideal.
Tyranny
& Despotism Index
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy Book...
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Magazine...
Academy
Showcase
Specials
|
|
|
|